What we found
Blue Sky Farms runs on software the farm owns. Before that, the farm paid for annually licensed software products and worked around what they could not do, waiting on vendors for changes. We built software the farm owns, replacing the licensed products, built to fit how the farm runs. The farm reports six figures a year saved on software costs so far. The exact dollar figure stays between us and the farm, so "six figures" is the public form.
This is the record of the work so far. The figure and the quote below belong to Blue Sky Farms and are published with their permission, confirmed by their CFO. They describe one farm and one set of products. Another business with another set will have its own arithmetic, and we say so before anyone carries these numbers into a budget meeting.
The annual license
An annually licensed product carries two costs, the invoice and the work people do around the gaps.
The invoice is the easy one to see. It arrives once a year for as long as the business uses the product, and it arrives whether or not the product did what the business needed that year.
The second cost is quieter. When a product will not do something the farm needs, people build a habit around the gap. Someone keeps a spreadsheet beside the system, enters the same number twice, or rebuilds a report by hand because the one in the product shows the wrong slice. Those habits take time every week, and every new person has to be taught them.
A third thing shows up in the way a year goes. The vendor decides what the software does next, so a request from the farm lands on a roadmap the farm does not control and the farm waits. That wait is the part Josh Mcdonald named when we talked about what had changed.
One product at a time
We replaced the licensed products one at a time, and the farm kept running the whole way through.
The order matters. We look at the size of the annual bill first, because the arithmetic has to work before anything else does. Then we look at how well the work can be written down. A product whose job the team can describe step by step is a good early replacement. Work where a person weighs something new every day stays where it is for now.
The licensed product keeps running until the replacement is doing the job. That overlap costs a little for a few weeks, and it means nobody at the farm is stuck waiting on us during a week when the work will not wait.
Each replacement is small enough to check on its own. The farm can see what the new tool does, say what is wrong with it, and get it fixed before the next one starts. What we learn in one replacement goes into the next, and the licensed products still in place set the order of the work after that.
The savings line
The saving is annual and it repeats.
The farm stopped paying for the licensed products that have been replaced. That money stays with the farm again every year it runs software it owns, which makes the saving easy to check against last year's invoices.
Owning software has its own costs and we name them plainly. The farm pays to host the system, to fix what breaks, and to build what it asks us for next. The six figures a year is what is left after those costs, measured against bills that arrived every year whether or not the products fit.
The words "so far" carry weight here. The replacement work is still going, so the line is a running total on a stack that is smaller than it was.
What ownership changed
The farm owns the tools and changes them when it needs to.
Here is how Josh Mcdonald, Blue Sky Farms' CFO, describes it:
"We were paying for a stack of software subscriptions every year and still working around what they couldn't do. Plainpath replaced them one at a time with tools we own and that fit how the farm actually runs. We're saving six figures a year, and we stopped waiting on vendors to fix things."
A change request at the farm is now a piece of work with a date on it. Someone at the farm decides what the software should do next, and the schedule is a conversation between the farm and us.
The way the farm runs is written into the software now, including the order of the steps, the names the team uses for things, and the checks that matter in a busy season.
Limits
These figures belong to one farm and one set of products.
Three things have to be true before replacing licensed software with software you own is worth the effort.
- The annual bill is large enough that the arithmetic works. A small subscription will not pay for a build.
- The team knows its own work well enough to describe it, because that description is the specification.
- Someone inside owns the software after we leave, asks for changes, and gets them. When nobody owns it, people drift back to their old steps and the software stops fitting. We wrote about builds nobody owns in why most AI pilots fail.
A build can also be far smaller than a stack of products. At Genesco Sports Enterprises, a month-end reconciliation that took the CFO about 4 days by hand now runs in about 60 seconds, and the record of that build is on this site. At McHur Care the replacement was one system, a custom EHR the practice now runs on every day.
To see where your own stack stands, write down every product you pay for each year, what it costs, and what it does. Then add the steps your team performs because the product will not do them, and the requests you have been waiting on a vendor to deliver. That list is the start of the arithmetic. Our walk-through for building it is how to run your first AI audit in an afternoon, and our audit agent is free and will run the same interview with you. If you want a person to check the list and write a build plan against it, that is Discovery.
Frequently asked questions
What did Plainpath build for Blue Sky Farms?
We built software the farm owns, replacing the licensed products, built to fit how the farm runs. The products were replaced one at a time, with each licensed product kept running until its replacement was doing the job.
How much did Blue Sky Farms save?
The farm reports six figures a year saved on software costs so far. The exact dollar figure stays between us and the farm, so "six figures" is the public form. It is a running total, because the replacement work is still going.
Does replacing licensed software with software you own make sense for every business?
No. The annual bill has to be large enough that the arithmetic works, the team has to know its own work well enough to describe it, and someone inside has to own the software after the build. When one of those is missing, a smaller build on a single process is the better first step.
What does owning software cost?
Hosting, fixing what breaks, and the work of building what you ask for next. At Blue Sky Farms the six figures a year is what is left after those costs, measured against bills that arrived every year whether or not the products fit.
Who owns the software Plainpath builds?
The client does. Blue Sky Farms owns its tools and changes them when it needs to. A change request becomes a piece of work with a date on it, scheduled between the farm and us.
The plain take
If you pay for licensed software every year, list each product, what it costs you annually, and the steps your team performs because the product will not do them. Where that bill is large, where the work can be described in steps, and where someone inside will own the result, replacing the product with software you own can pay every year, as it has at Blue Sky Farms. Start with our free audit agent, and book Discovery when you want a person to check the list and write the build plan against it.
If one of your processes looks like this, the free audit at /compass is where to start.